Scan the Block · compared
How this compares, honestly
Three ways to look up a Los Angeles address — each described from its own public materials as of August 22, 2026, with the places the others win stated as plainly as the places we do.
| Scan the Block | NeighborhoodScout | PropertyShark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Los Angeles, every address | Nationwide, per its site | Nationwide, with New York depth, per its site |
| Price of one report | $19 as a single one-off report, or a $19/mo Trade plan for contractors (permits and violations, no card to start); full plans from $49/mo — re-reading anything you've run is always free | $30 per report or subscription, per its site | One free report, then subscription, per its site |
| Crime around the address | Counts by year vs. the city average — never scored | Crime ratings and indices, per its site | Crime data within its reports, per its site |
| Eviction notices on the parcel | The Housing Department's recorded notices, by date, on this parcel | not among its published features* | not among its published features* |
| Activity around the address | Named absent, deliberately — the city's live portal publishes neither 311 nor fire call-outs, and the report says so rather than showing an empty card | not among its published features* | Violations data, per its site |
| Permits and zoning | LADBS building, electrical and plumbing permits on the parcel back to 1988, certificates of occupancy, code-enforcement cases open and closed, zoning and overlays | not among its published features* | Permits, zoning and FAR, per its site |
| Title documents, liens, foreclosures | Not offered — Los Angeles publishes none of it as open data; a title search's job | not among its published features* | Liens, title documents and foreclosure research, per its site |
| Owners and people | Never — no owner is named, by design | Demographics of areas, per its site | Ownership research including LLC identification, per its site |
| Verification & sharing | Expiring share links; every PDF carries a code anyone can check at scantheblock.com | not among its published features* | not among its published features* |
| Scores, grades and forecasts | Refused, by design — counts and comparisons only | Ratings and predictive forecasts are core features, per its site | Property estimates and reports, per its site |
| Watching a building | Weekly email per watched building; daily parcel-only escrow mode | not among its published features* | Saved searches with update notifications, per its site |
| Daily filing lists | What the city filed today, by filing type, as a morning email you choose. 15 lists. | not among its published features* | Foreclosure and property lists, per its site |
| AI and machine access | Ask any report questions; Claude access over MCP and a REST API on the larger plans | not among its published features* | not among its published features* |
| A report you can forward | Web report and PDF, with sources and caveats on every figure | Purchasable reports, per its site | Property reports, per its site |
Los Angeles's own free tool, named rather than graded
the City of Los Angeles publishes ZIMAS, the Zone Information and Map Access System, free to anyone.
It has no column here, and the reason is the rule at the bottom of this page: every cell about somebody else's product is read out of that product's own published materials, and ZIMAS does not publish one we could read — it is an application that renders its features to a browser rather than to a page. Rather than fill fourteen cells with what we assume a municipal parcel viewer does, it is named, linked, and left uncompared. It is free, it is official, and it is worth opening. If you work for the City of Los Angeles and want the row-by-row comparison done properly, send us the feature list and we will build the column.
* Not listed among that product's published features when we read its public pages on August 22, 2026. Products change — verify with the vendor.
Where the others win
The Property Information Map is free and official. It is the Planning Department's own tool, and for a quick zoning or permit look-up on one parcel it is the right first stop. What it does not do is read the eviction, rent, crime, fire or 311 record, compare anything to the city, or produce a document you can forward — it describes itself as general information requiring professional advice for specific uses.
PropertyShark reaches records we refuse or cannot reach. Title documents, liens and foreclosure research are real needs in a transaction, Los Angeles publishes none of that as open data, and ownership research is their business and deliberately not ours — this product names no person, which is a design decision with a cost, and this is the cost.
NeighborhoodScout covers the whole country. If you need Cleveland tomorrow, we are not your tool yet. Its analytics are also a different product philosophy: ratings and predictive forecasts, which some readers want and this product refuses on principle — a report that scores a neighborhood is scoring the people in it.
Not a mirror of the portal
The city's data is free, and anyone can read it — the table above says so. What a report buys is the work between the portal and the page, and it is worth naming, because none of it is visible until you try to do without it.
Cleaned. The rent inventory publishes rents as text bands the portal itself cannot average — read naively, “$1751–$2000” parses as seventeen million. Nearly half of all plumbing permits carry no recorded outcome, which is neither open nor closed, and counting them as either is wrong. The police record changed systems in 2018 and the two datasets overlap for five months; added together they double-count. Every one of these is handled, and the handling is stated on the page where it matters.
Organized. Forty-two sections in the order a decision asks for them, not sixty datasets in the order a portal lists them. Eviction notices split by their stated ground, because a dispute inside a tenancy and a building leaving the rental market are different facts wearing one count. Reported rents split by when each tenancy began, which is the difference between an anchored figure and a market one. And joins the city never publishes — the condominium roll against the violations register, every parcel record merged into one timeline.
Enriched. The city's record sits beside what the city cannot know: FEMA's flood layer with its panel and effective date, USGS earthquakes that actually happened, the state's fault zones, census housing figures, the FCC's address-level broadband filings, NREL's solar model, national historic listings, and a market estimate labeled as its provider's. And every area count is compared with an average Los Angeles area of the same size — the arithmetic that turns a number into information — with the source and the caveat traveling beside it onto the PDF.
Where this one does
Depth, in one city, without opinions. The Housing Department's recorded notices, by date, on this parcel — that appears in none of the others. Every area count is set against an average Los Angeles area of the same size, so a number arrives with its context. Every figure names its source and carries its caveat into the PDF. And nothing is scored, graded or predicted — which is both a principle and, for a brokerage forwarding reports to clients, a compliance property none of the alternatives offers.
The front page runs on live output
Every number in the worked example is the report's own, dated. Judge the product by the thing itself.
See it on a real address