The city publishes none
Not a stale feed, not a partial one. Oakland's open-data portal carries 313 datasets and none of them is a building permit; the city's own mapping organization carries none either, and neither does the county's. Its permits run through the Oakland Online Portal, an Accela system that answers one typed address at a time through a web form. That is a lookup, not a dataset, and nothing here scrapes it.
What that costs a reader
The question every other city here answers first — what work was permitted on this building, and what was not — cannot be answered from public data in Oakland. Nor can the version of it that matters most in practice: what was done without a permit. Any product that tells you an Oakland building's permit history is either reading that portal one address at a time or telling you about something else.
Where to look instead
- The Oakland Online Portal. The city's own Accela site, one address at a time, and the authoritative answer.
- The county roll's improvement value. A jump between two roll years that is not a sale is often work finished and assessed. The report shows seven years side by side, which is where you would see it.
- 311. A resident reporting a property to code enforcement is in the report and in the daily lists. It is a report rather than a finding, and the report says so.
- The city’s building footprints, where it has published one. They carry the storey count and the ground a building covers, which the county roll does not — but they cover about 5,100 of Oakland’s 113,000 parcels and are weighted toward downtown, so most addresses do not have one.
Counts run 5 September 2026.